[gpars-dev] [Fwd: GPars and Groovy]

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[gpars-dev] [Fwd: GPars and Groovy]

Russel Winder-2
I had intended to send this to both developer lists, sorry.

-------- Forwarded Message --------

> From: Russel Winder <[hidden email]>
> To: Groovy_Developers <[hidden email]>
> Subject: GPars and Groovy
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:58:43 +0000
>
> With all the changes around the Groovy project, projects such as GPars
> and Spock need to plan their future. Spock is SEP, hopefully the Spock
> team are thinking about what to do. As for GPars:
>
> GPars was a separate project so as to have an independent development
> cycle. Also Groovy was monolithic at the time, and GPars needed to have
> a separate existence so as to be usable with Java.
>
> GPars can remain a separate project but some futures of Groovy may
> impact massively wrt Groovy distributions.
>
> Groovy is now modularized and it would be possible for GPars to be a
> module in the Groovy codebase.
>
> Given the state of Groovy, GPars, etc. I wonder if merging GPars into
> Groovy as a module might be for the best of both GPars and Groovy.
>
>
> --
> Russel.
> =============================================================================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:[hidden email]
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [hidden email]
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:[hidden email]
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [hidden email]
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

signature.asc (188 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [gpars-dev] [Fwd: GPars and Groovy]

Graeme Rocher
+1 to making it a Groovy module

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Russel Winder <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I had intended to send this to both developer lists, sorry.
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> From: Russel Winder <[hidden email]>
>> To: Groovy_Developers <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: GPars and Groovy
>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:58:43 +0000
>>
>> With all the changes around the Groovy project, projects such as GPars
>> and Spock need to plan their future. Spock is SEP, hopefully the Spock
>> team are thinking about what to do. As for GPars:
>>
>> GPars was a separate project so as to have an independent development
>> cycle. Also Groovy was monolithic at the time, and GPars needed to have
>> a separate existence so as to be usable with Java.
>>
>> GPars can remain a separate project but some futures of Groovy may
>> impact massively wrt Groovy distributions.
>>
>> Groovy is now modularized and it would be possible for GPars to be a
>> module in the Groovy codebase.
>>
>> Given the state of Groovy, GPars, etc. I wonder if merging GPars into
>> Groovy as a module might be for the best of both GPars and Groovy.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Russel.
>> =============================================================================
>> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:[hidden email]
>> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [hidden email]
>> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>
> --
> Russel.
> =============================================================================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:[hidden email]
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [hidden email]
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder



--
Graeme Rocher

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email